REGULAR readers of this blog will know I'm a huge fan of Parsix, the Debian-based Linux distribution created by a small team in Iran.
In my in-depth review of version 1.0 I said:
“The fact that it's all sitting on a Debian base is hugely reassuring, and my initial concerns about using a system primarily designed for Persian users – with all the language-based implications that brings – have been completely erased. Parsix 1.0 comes very highly recommended.”
Now we have Parsix 1.5r0, codename 'Viola', with the promise of extra features and improvements to what was already a fine operating system.
As of June 25th, all the packages in Parsix 1.5r0 have been synchronised between the Parsix and Debian Lenny (Testing) repositories, so rest assured, you're getting pretty cutting edge applications with this release.
Let me pick out some highlights: Linux 2.6.24.4; GNOME 2.22.2; X.Org 7.3; GNU Iceweasel 3.0 RC-2; OpenOffice.org 2.4.0; Glibc 2.7; Pidgin 2.4.2; GIMP 2.4.6; Synaptic 0.62; Exaile 0.2.13 and xFarDic 0.11.4.
Further, the developers have replaced GQView with gThumb image viewer, Camorama has been dropped in favour of the Cheese webcam utility, and both iptraf and nmap make a return.
For the first time – and this is where things get really interesting - Parsix Viola officially supports Compiz-Fusion, VirtualBox-OSE and GNU Flash Player, all of which I'll return to in due course.
The Parsix artwork team have been busy for this release: Gone is the Black/Blue/Orange theme; it's now Black/Green/Orange, along with a nice green default background with a distinctly oriental feel. It's a pleasing, professional look.

Installing Parsix Viola is a fairly straightforward affair – it's done from a live CD environment (you don't have to install at all if you don't want to – just keep using Parsix as a live CD).Just a note here about the boot options available when you first fire up the live CD: There are some nice options, including one to load into a 1200x800 widescreen resolution.
Installation is done by double-clicking on the desktop icon (you'll need the root password, which is 'parsix').
The only potential installation snag for new users is the fact that you have to have to have partitions ready for it at the outset.
The installer won't create those partitions for you; instead, you're pointed in the direction of Gparted in the System menu, which does the job nicely.
There's a really good installation guide here, which is suitable for absolute beginners.
It's as trouble-free an install as any I've come across and takes about 20 minutes from start to finish.
Once you boot into your HD install you're faced with a comprehensive range of programs sufficient to keep you productive in just about any area: Balsa handles your email; GIMP and Inkscape satisfy your artistic cravings; Brasero takes care of your burning desires; OpenOffice takes care of business; Transmission copes with your torrents and VLC keeps you entertained.
These are all well and good, but it was the newcomers that particularly interested me.
Primarily, I'm talking about VirtualBox and Gnash.
While 3D effects are of little interest to me, I should also report that Compiz works flawlessly and that there are excellent configuration utilities for both it and the Emerald theme manager, so if whizzy globes and burning windows are your thing, Viola has what you need.
Given that you'll need 3D drivers before you can take full advantage of Compiz, there are also great guides for ATI and Nvidia graphics cards on the Parsix website.Now to VirtualBox, my favourite piece of virtualisation software.
VirtualBox has started to appear in a lot of distribution repositories, but this is the first time I've come across it pre-installed in a distribution.
This is the Open Source Edition (OSE) which, in the past, has tended to be a little flaky and lacking in features when compared with the full version downloadable from the VirtualBox website.It's no longer either of those things, however, and the fact it's pre-installed means users not having to jump through the configuration hoops which have troubled us in the past.
This, alone, makes Parsix worth trying, in my opinion.
Unfortunately, I can't report the same level of satisfaction with Gnash, the free/open source Flash media player which comes with Viola.
I checked on the Gnash website first, to make sure my expectations weren't unrealistic, and I have to report that it wouldn't play YouTube Flash vidoes, as advertised.
I then checked on the Parsix forum to see if any other users were having the same problem, and found one posting which advised dumping Gnash completely and replacing it with the Mozilla-Flash-Player.A quick Google revealed Parsix users weren't the only ones having trouble with Gnash, which is a shame as I'd really like this project to be successful... maybe it's still just too early for it. We shall see.
I can't praise Parsix 1.5r0 enough: It's stable while being cutting edge, stylish while being practical and is certainly in my top five favourite distributions, which is saying something given how low-profile it remains (it's still only at No 57 on the Distrowatch page-hit ranking list, which is ridiculously low).
Try it – please – and you'll see what I mean.

23 comments:
I have used Parsix for the last 9 months it is the most complete Linux distro out their and Alan is really helpful if you need help.
hello stave,
i know Parsix since the version 0.8. it's a nice distribution. stable. complete. fast. better than ubuntu and Co !
your blog is nice !
@+ petitbob
@ spratt and petitbob
Thanks for the comments guys - I totally agree with you and really can't understand why Parsix doesn't have a much higher profile. It's every bit as good as any of the Distrowatch top ten, and the team who help users on the forum are among the friendliest, most helpful around.
Thanks for reading my blog and for taking the trouble to comment - and keep spreading the word about Parsix.
Steve
> "one posting which advised dumping Gnash completely and replacing it with the Mozille-Flash-Player."
Yes unfortunately Gnash is a crap. But you can try swfdec, sometimes it works better than Gnash... But for a true support of Flash there is no alternative, you must use Adobe Flash Player. :-(
Hi.
You use a lot of superlatives about this distro, but judging from the examples you use, it seems to me that it's merly on par with most other distros, not way ahead of them. I mean, OK, it's good that it has the latest versions of the Kernel, Gnome, Firefox, Gimp etc, but so does all the newer distros. The only thing, it seems, that makes this distro stand out is pre-installed Virtual Box, and while this is good, I'm not sure if it's GREAT. Besides, you haven't even mentioned important issues like package management (as it's debian, I'm guessing Synaptic), configuration tools, security, multimedia codecs, etc...
I guess what I fail to see is: What, if anything, makes Parsix stand out compared to e.g. Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, OpenSUSE, PCLinux, Fedora, Mepis, Mandriva or Sabayon?
Re last anonymous comment - that's a reasonable thing to point out, but as you can see I included a link to my previous Parsix review at the start of this latest one.
I didn't feel there was any point going over the same ground on things like Synaptic, config tools and multimedia etc, which I had already covered and which remain the same in this latest version.
I chose, instead, to try to cover things that were new in v1.5r0.
If you combine all the areas I covered previously with the new points I raise in this review, then hopefully you can start to see why I rate Parsix so highly.
Hope that explains the omissions, and thanks for taking the trouble to comment.
I always get somewhat confused over reviews of Distro's heavily based on their parent projects, in this case, Debian. What precisely does Parsix have, that Debian does not, or can not offer with some small amount of tweaking????..
Nothing, right?..
K, thats what I thought, thanks. So then the next logical question would be, why do I need Parsix over just plain Debian if they are exactly the same, minus some small tweaks?..
Worthless blog and review, but thanks for trying.
To meet the people asking what advantage for Parsix over other distribs, I want to clarify what precisely Parsix is:
Parsix = Debian testing + selected Ubuntu 8.04 backports + some extra tools (e.g. from Kanotix), adapted + a newer kernel + own theme + debian-multimedia.org repositories added by default.
This is why Parsix had to update its kernel independently of Debian testing (and it did, watch for Bug #84).
The advantages: "rolling-release Debian testing", reasonably stable and with newer packages than Etch (Etch doesn't even have Claws Mail), even newer packages in a few selected cases (because of rebuilding from an unreleased yet Ubuntu Hardy), a good default selection of packages, some extra advantages for Iranian users.
Disadvantages: theoretically less stable than Etch, theoretically less stable than Debian testing, possible inherited issues from Ubuntu Hardy. (In my case, I had to forcefully downgrade Brasero from 0.7.1 to 0.6.1 from Debian testing.) (quote from a website)
@davemc; that's absolutely ridiculous! :)
You are worthless! :D hehe
@red devil; yes, parsix surely deserves some attention. It's nice to have a "another" debian offspring for those of us who think "hardy" wasn't such a hit really.
@ BlueKnight - Many thanks for clarifying those things.
@ davemc - I'm sorry that you think my blog is "worthless".
Nonetheless, I'll try to address your points - even though, presumably, you won't be back here to read my reply.
Not too long ago I installed Debian 4.0 (KDE version) and I returned to the notes I made at the time to help me answer your points.
I'm reluctant to compare Debian and Parsix (I'm not interested in Blah vs Blah articles myself - they always end in pointless flame wars), but I'll list the respective experiences I had, just for you:
1. Debian took several minutes to do a hardware scan during every single boot-up, seemingly struggling to detect my multi-car reader (Parsix scoots through hardware detection)
2. Debian's system fonts were ridiculously small and bitmapped (Parsix fonts are fine)
3. Debian sound wasn't working until I reran alsaconf (Parsix sound worked from the off)
4. I had to install Synaptic from the Debian repository (Parsix already had it)
5. Before I could play any multimedia in Debian I had to edit apt/sources.list to include the multimedia repo, then download win32codecs, mplayer plugin, flash player plugin, Real Player, libdvdcss etc etc (Parsix plays all my multimedia out of the box)
6. I had to download and install VirtualBox from the Debian repository (Parsix has it pre-installed)
7. My wireless NIC wouldn't work in Debian (It works fine in Parsix)
8. KDM Theme Manager would not work in Debian if accessed through KDE Control Centre. This was a reported bug. (Parsix configuration utilities all work as expected)
9. Debian's default desktop is dull and plain (Parsix has professional polish and looks like care has been taken over it)
Those are the main issues - but not all the issues - I faced with my Debian install.
And please note: I'm not doing this to 'knock' Debian - I actually like it a lot and used it as my main desktop for quite some time.
> "Parsix plays all my multimedia out of the box"
? Hmm when I installed Parsix it did not "plays all my multimedia out of the box"
You have not "win32codecs, mplayer plugin, flash player plugin, Real Player..." pre-installed, so you must do some work after install... (no java also)
My MP3s and videos played straight away in Parsix 1.0, and they still do in Parsix 1.5r0. What can I say?
MP3s and videos, maybe, but not all "multimedia"... Without "win32codecs, mplayer plugin, flash player plugin, Real Player, Java...", you can not play everything.
There is some packages to add/change to have a complete multimedia coverage... But then they should have installed some non-free packages, and this is not the philosophy of Debian... (although debian-multimedia.org repositories are added by default)
One might have hoped a complete "out of the box" experience, as Mint or Pardus -to cite only these two distros.
But Parsix is an excellent distro and this "little work" after install is not very difficult nor very long... ;-)
@Blue Knight - So, your saying then that Parsix really is more like a Ubuntu wannabe, without that cushy 10 million pound trust fund and a spaceman to back the project.
@Anonymous - Parsix deserves the attention it warrents, ie. that it is a Ubuntu wannabe (in that it attempts to emulate the Ubuntu projects methodologies but without the backing of a solid foundation), and yet another Debian incarnation (rather than its own unique project such as PuppyLinux, Red Hat/Fedora, Pardus, SabayonLinux, OpenSUSE, Gentoo, etc.)
For more out of the box experience use Pardus 2008.
One of the best distros available.
@red devil - I did read your reply, and appreciate the response. I called your blog what I did because it did nothing to address what I feel would be the most important of questions to anyone reading through it. "Who, What, When, Where, WHY, and HOW". Those are the big 5 questions that every critical writer (like a Distro Reviewer) must ask him/herself whenever they sit down to put something to ink. Without answering those things, you leave the reader more confused after reading your article than before. This must be put into perspective for the topic about which you write however, and in this case, that is about a "new" Linux Distro. It happens to be one of hundreds, and the tone of your blog comes off as more of a sales pitch than a critical review (there are no critical tests or comparisons, no testing framework, etc). You urge people to try it, just because. You give no solid reasons for your suggestion until you answered my post, and those are mostly subjective. Your reasons listed:
1 - 8. I can buy these to an extent. The current Debian stable uses the 2.6.18 kernel which has none of the troubles you state on any of my workstations or servers. Older incarnations of Debian did experience some of these issues however. My guess is that you have not looked at Debian lately. Since Parsix is based on Debian Unstable and its kernel works well for you, then it must follow logically that plain Debian works well for you too, since in Debian you can compile whatever kernel you want, whatever version of HAL you want, etc. Granted, these things are not for the "average user", yet they are not at all hard to do either. Ubuntu and Parsix do these things for you, and either they work or they dont - that is the real difference and the "how" of it.
"9. Debian's default desktop is dull and plain (Parsix has professional polish and looks like care has been taken over it)"
Desktop appearances, fonts, and window borders are completely modular in Linux and easily tailored, regardless of what Distro you use. This should not even enter the equation when critically reviewing any Distro, unless the theming/artwork is completely unique and exclusive, at least until contributed upstream.
Again, this is just my 2 cents for what its worth. I trust your objective was to provide an unbiased, objective and critical review here. I dont think that objective was met in this case. That is all.
> "Since Parsix is based on Debian Unstable"
Sorry davemc, Parsix is not based on debian unstable but on Debian TESTING!
It's not the same branch...
"Sorry davemc, Parsix is not based on debian unstable but on Debian TESTING!"
I stand corrected. Thanks for the info.
I have some problems with Ati drivers on parsix so I swicth new Pardus 2008 and I thnik it is the best desktop distro so far.No problems at all.
For davemc ;-)
We can also mention as specific to Parsix:
"Ramon r1 introduced the continent apt reporitory along with the official supported Parsix repository. The Continent repository consists of the whole Debian testing archive minus the official Parsix repository packages. Note that the continent repository for Parsix Ramon is frozen now and will not receive updates from Debian except critical fixes. This is a new release policy to make Parsix more stable like approach. The Continent repository will be continued to be updated for the next Parsix release code name Viola and will be frozen before the final release of it, and so on. So if you like to keep your system more stable" etc. (http://www.parsix.org/html/pnWikka-tag-ReleaseNotes15r0.html)
So as a guy in a blog says, "if I got it right (despite the confusing mentioning of the current Viola release at the future tense), this is an attempt to build "stable" releases based on Debian "testing", which is an extraordinary idea" :D
@ collapse
You may want to try Myah OS (http://myah.org/index.php):
"Since Jeremiah (the founder of Myah OS) has "been a fan of ATI cards" and his only computer, a Dell inspiron laptop, has an ATI 9600, he has included full 3D support for those graphic chips. "I have never had any luck with Linux drivers for it. Most distros don't support ATI at all and the ones that do, don't do it well. So the ATI support is because I want to make a system I would use," says Jeremiah. Further, "I didn't want to shut out the nVidia people, so I used a slax module for them." Nvidia support is extended to include "TNT drivers into the scripts for people with older nvidia cards." This is one of only a few distros that I'm aware of at this time that goes to that extra effort for their users. I booted up myah using only the nohd option and my video card was correctly detected and the nvidia drivers loaded accordingly."
Written on 11/05/2005 but probably still valid.
Hey there Red Devil,
I love your blog and take your opinion very seriously because I have almost always agreed with you. It just so happens that I have been looking for a new distro to try out and it looks like Parsix is it.
Thanks alot and keep up the good work!
PirateTux
@ piratetux,
Thanks for the kind words - and I hope you enjoy Parsix.. it's a terrific distro.
Post a Comment