Thursday, July 17, 2008

BLAG 90000: The Rebel Distro

THERE'S an alluring whiff of rebellion about the Linux/Open Source community.
I like it that way because it reminds me of the days when I was young and argumentative and had the energy to try to make a difference.
Back then I brandished my principles like a weapon; my targets were conservatives and tyrants, racists and bigots, religions, polluters, torturers and corporate thieves.
Now I am older and wearier, and it is all I can do to put food on the table and keep a roof over the heads of my young family.
I think this partly explains the attraction of Linux to me.
Using Linux, writing about Linux, championing Linux - it is like sticking up two fingers (or one, if you are reading this in America) to a corporate world that insists on telling me what I can and cannot do with my own computers.
Linux appeals to the bloody-minded, anti-authoritarian, rebel in me.
It appeals to the part of me that always cheers the little guy in the movies, as he takes on faceless, Kafka-esque agencies and regimes.
And perhaps all this explains why I like the attitude taken by BLAG Linux and Gnu, a Linux distribution which is largely the work of 37-year-old Jeff Moe, aka Jebba.
The operating system's name derives from the Brixton Linux Action Group, which "works to overthrow corporate control of information and technology through community action and spreading free software".
Great, I am with you there guys.
I recently installed BLAG 90000 on one of my computers, but I am not going to trouble you with a traditional Linux review.
Suffice it to say that BLAG 90000 is based on Fedora, uses the outstanding Anaconda installer and is easy to use and maintain.Check it out and see for yourselves.
What I want to focus on instead is what I hinted at earlier: BLAG 90000's attitude, the spirit it represents.
Every time I use BLAG 90000, I cannot help thinking of rebels like Che Guevara.
I do not know Jeff Moe, nor do I know anything about his political beliefs.
So, this is my imagination at work and should not be interpreted as any kind of intention or propaganda on the behalf of BLAG 90000's creator.
It is quite possible that there exists a whole generation of kids who think Che Guevara is just a cool-looking dude on a T-shirt.
Guevara was a lot more than just a poster boy for rebellion.
He was a Marxist revolutionary and guerrilla leader and, as such, was no stranger to the use of violence as a means to his ends.
He was also an author and physician (I highly recommend you watch The Motorcycle Diaries, which is based on his early life).
He campaigned and fought against inequality, monopolistic capitalism, neo-colonialism and imperialism.
Or, if you are George W Bush, he was a PITA lefty terrorist with dubious friends.
Anyway, what is it about BLAG 90000 that sets my mind wandering off down this leftish fork in the road?
Well, for starters, when you first launch BLAG 90000, the boot splash contains a message: "Novelty is oblivion".
This is a paraphrase of a quotation from Francis Bacon's essay, 'Of Vicissitude Of Things', and references Bacon's supposition that there is little that is new in the world.
I cannot explain why Jeff Moe decided this was a fitting introduction to his creation, but you have to admit it is a distinctive way to kick things off.
It is also a precursor of what is to follow, once you start to dig beneath the surface of BLAG 90000.
For example, when you launch Firefox.
You know how most Linux distributions often include links to their wiki or forum?
BLAG does that, too, but there is much, much more in the BLAG 90000 bookmarks folder.
In fact, there are so many entries I could not possibly list them all here, so what follows is a small sample that is relevant to the theme of my article:

Aktivix - Linux for Activists
Free Software Foundation
Democracy Now!
SchNEWS - direct action newsletter
Antiwar.com
The Spirit of Resistance Lives
Reporters Without Borders
Guerrilla News Network
Squall - Radical Quality Journalism
Disinformation
Anarchist Resistance in the Capital of the Empire
Anarcho-Syndicalist Review
Anarchy for Anybody
Bureau of Public Secrets
CounterPunch
Disinfopedia
Federation of Revolutionary Anarchist Collectives
Green Anarchy
Institute for Anarchist Studies
Peoples' Global Action
Primitivism.com
Raise the Fist
Resist.ca
Turning the Tide
Amnesty International
Banksy
CorpWatch
Earth First! Journal
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Guerrilla News Network
Human Rights Watch
NO TO WAR
Protest.Net: A calendar of protest, meetings, and conferences
Electronic Privacy Information Center

..and there are more - lots, lots more.
Now, is my admittedly left-field analogy starting to make sense yet?
There is more.
In the release announcement for BLAG 90000, Jeff Moe declares that it is a 100% free software operating system.
Plus, it is the first major BLAG release to feature the Linux-libre kernel.
Linux-libre is a project to make a branch of the Linux kernel with all the non-free software bits removed.
BLAG's parent distribution, Fedora, has a long history of striving to adhere to the strict principles of 100% free software, and 90000 tracks Fedora 9 (plus there's a BLAGHEAD repository which tracks 'Rawhide).
So, this is clearly a distribution with its own finely-honed set of principles; if you do not like that, fine, there are lots of other distributions which are happy to give you all the non-free software you desire.
And isn't that another great thing about Linux - the freedom to choose?
Finally, you know how on most Linux forums you are discouraged from posting anything which is even vaguely political?
Well, the BLAG forum has a separate section for 'Politics', where rants and trolls are encouraged!
Now, where did I put my beret...

FOOTNOTE:

This post has been edited to better reflect my original intention.
Plus, this has just been posted on Distrowatch.com:

Jeff Moe announced a bug fix release of BLAG Linux And GNU labeled as 90001, a single-CD desktop distribution based on Fedora: "It comes on a single CD (684 megs), is easily installed, and user friendly. This release follows quickly on the heels of BLAG 90000, as there were a few annoying issues with that, some of which have been sorted, such as some broken dependencies. A number of packages have been added to the CD, some of which appeared in earlier BLAG releases, such as: bittorrent, freej, gcc, gqview, gthumb, thunderbird, vnc-server, xchat. The CD has 97 package updates including a new kernel-libre-2.6.25.10-86.fc9.1, firefox 3.0.1, gnome/gtk2/nautilus packages, pidgin, xorg and more... Known issues with this release: Use yum instead of apt, or uncomment GPG line in /etc/apt/apt.conf (or install those keys); Automajick kickstart installs are not currently available; On some installs you have to hit ctrl-alt-f7 after first boot when you add a user; this is only needed the first time."

32 comments:

Sam Duncan said...

"Every time I use BLAG 90000, I cannot help thinking of Che Guevara."

Oh, does it want to be "a cold killing machine, motivated by pure hate" as well? Nice.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the heads up. Ill make certain never to waste the time to download blag. Its funny Ive met quite a few people from different areas of the former soviet union. And although they have great national pride they dont advocate socialism in any way as they apprieciate the chance to improve their lot in life in a free society. Its funny that the greatest supporters of socialism are fools who have never had to live under forced equality. And are foolish enough to make heroes out of murderers and criminals.

Anonymous said...

> "they apprieciate the chance to improve their lot in life in a free society."

What free society? You really think being in a free society? OK there is no more Stalin & Co, but this freedom is often illusory. Look at what's happening in different countries, look at Mr Bush, Mr Sarkozy in France etc.

No we are not really "free", it's just that the means employed are more sophisticated, hidden etc.

Criolo from Brasil said...

Yeah! Where´s that free country you´re talking about? I pay to see one.
And it´s a real pity Che kicked US and it´s marionette Batista government out of Cuba or it might have become a paradise like Guatemala or Bolivia are by now.
I sure will test this BLAG thing as soon as I have a spare partition - this review got me interested in it, thanks for sharing, Steve.

Greg said...

I imagine there are a lot of cuban refugees who would have a very different opinion about what kind of "paradise" castro has turned cuba into. To bad the thousands che murdered arent around to give their views.

Petitbob said...

hello steve,

good paper !
blag is a anarchist distribution !
anarchist isn't communist !

@+ petitbob

Red Devil said...

@ Sam Duncan. Thanks for the comments Sam - I was expecting someone to react that way. May I remind you of the phrase, "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"?
It's a trite saying but does contain an element of truth - I suppose it is a question of perspective.
To say Guevara was motivated by pure hate is accurate, but you neglect to comment on the targets for his hate - tyrants and their lackeys, imperialists, monopolies, etc etc.
And he was a guerrilla - from the French word 'guerre', meaning 'war'. Soldiers tend to kill people - it's part of the job description and what you need to consider is not the what, but the why.
Also, remember that possibly the most feted man in living memory, Nelson Mandela, supported an armed struggle against the evil of apartheid.
You mention "murderers and criminals", but neglect to mention the best possible example of such in our very recent history - the illegal war in Iraq, perpetrated by George W Bush and his poodle Tony Blair ostensibly to rid the world of a tyrant, but anyone with any insight knows that war was and still is about oil and making money for big business and the Christian right in America.

@ Greg. I didn't actually mention Castro's regime in my piece, but to an extent I agree with you. Castro's legacy of one of the finest state education and medical systems in the world must be balanced against economic failure and restrictions on liberty - Cubans have only this year been granted the right to buy a computer, for example.
And FYI, if I am anything, I am a cynical, lapsed socialist - communism is not my bag.

@ petitbob - nice to see you back here! You are correct that BLAG seems to lean more toward anarchy than socialism or communism, but I was talking about the general 'feeling' using BLAG gave me. It was the "whiff of rebellion" that I found so refreshing, not so much its anarchic leanings.
Basically, it revived something in me that I thought was long lost.

@ anonymous posters - have the courage to leave your names and then I'll bother to reply to your comments.

Anil Yilmaz said...

Thank you for this informative and interesting review Steve.
I, for one, being 37 now, feel weary and disappointed about the way the society goes. It's refreshing and to some degree encouraging to know, there are other people like.
It is very sad to see such comments about Che, blaming him being a murderer etc. Or the corrupt application of communism / socialism in Cuba or Soviets. Anarcho-socialist ideals were never wrong and they stood the test of time. Struggle and passion for power is the real evil and it manifests itself in all the political regimes, whether communist or capitalist.
It seems that Blag deserves at least a download and install for their political views.

Kimo Lee said...

Politics put aside: BLAG has a small but good and nice community. Even though I don't use BLAG any more (I've settled for Arch which fits my technical mind set better) I'm grateful for the time I spent with it. That Jeff personally is engaged in the support does also add to the community feeling. You don't have to be the slightest interested in Jeff's or other BLAG users political views to enjoy it.

It's so funny to see that Jeff keeps on choosing those Gnome themes and wallpapers. They really stand out, don't they? Never mind looks might be changed easily.

About some of the comments here: it's probably just easier for us humans to paint our views in black and white, because we have problems even admitting being wrong or that our lifestyle actually is created on blood and injustice. Good guy and bad guy is so much simpler than to accept we're living a lie.

davemc said...

People tend to forget that it was and has always been Anarchist-like movements that have brought on the only real and humanistic changes in the world as we know it today (American Revolution, French Revolution, etc). This has also been mixed with movements that were not so good, but that is the nature of change, and one must accept and learn from the mistakes made in the past if we are to eventually end up with some type of happy world order that fairly and adequately takes care of everyone's needs. We DO have a world order now - don't be so naive as to think that there isn't - but it is not happy, nor fair. Oh, and interesting "review", btw.

Anonymous said...

I live in Italy....Democrazy is all what we can talk about...
Blag is a GREAT DISTRO..that's all...

David said...

This is the most engaging review I have read in years. The Red devil is brilliant. I mean, come on, man. Anyone that can take a linux review switch gears half way through and transition into politics has to be a genius. If that bit of writing didn't stir up your rebellious juices then be thank full for the privileged life you live. I for one have tried blag and enjoyed it very much as a distro. But, it is my opinion that this review has nothing to do with blag per se, but more to do with feeling helpless and alone. Where have all the heroes gone. They now only show up in Holly Wood movies doing what we should be doing but are afraid to do. I say 3 cheers to the Red Devil and hip hip hooray for BLAG.

divadgnol

Anonymous said...

Blag is a very decent distro and I used it for years as my primary desktop, but really, it has a much more anarchist than socialist ethos. If you really want the "Che Guevara Of Linux" I suggest you check out Red Star Linux, an Argentine Debian release even dubbed "Che 80" in honor of Che's birthday. The distro has a very well appointed KDE desktop and is crawling with lefty iconography and links, including some great music.

Personally, I prefer Debian to Fedora, KDE to Gnome (especially since Fedora 9 only offers the buggy, unfinished KDE4 desktop in its repositories), and, truth be told, socialism to anarchism. (I used to be an anarchist, but there were too many meetings and folks were too disorganized.)

Even the moribund Red Flag Linux from Red China has more specifically of a tinge of scientific socialism about it than BLAG, truth be told.

As to Che, I think he truly lived up to his credo that "At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that a true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." Yes, Che participated in tribunals at La Cabaña that judged and executed several hundred of dictator Fulgencio Batista's thugs & torturers, and I say, good on him. The revolution was fighting a remorseless and brutal enemy guilty of horrific crimes; even if you love humanity there are some folks that just need killing. There were something like 638 documented attempts to assasinate Castro, from the 60's era CIA cooperation with organized crime mobs which used to run Havana before the revolution to an effort to plant 90 kg of explosives under a podium Fidel was supposed to use in Panama in 2000.

I just wish Che had been less kind with Luis Posada Carriles, a CIA operative who admitted to involvement in a string of hotels & nightspot bombings and destroying a Cuban airliner with 73 people. He was caught in Panama with the 90 kg mentioned above, but released by the Panamanian "client" government. The U.S., in the middle of its permanent "War of Terrorism", released Carriles from custody in 2007 and refuses Venezuela's request to extradite him to face trial on the 1976 airline bombing. Sometimes you are better off shooting a son-of-a-bitch when you've got the chance.

Greg said...

Red devil

If you think castro has provided "one of the finest state education and medical systems in the world" you really should get your facts from somewhere other than the extremely factually challenged Michael Moore.

Fine state education?
http://www.therealcuba.com/FreeEducation.htm
Probably ok if you dont mind having you children hopelessly indoctrinated into a fanatical an economically crippling idiology.

Finest medical system?
http://www.therealcuba.com/Page10.htm
One again probably pretty good if you are a foreign visitor paying for you treatment. Not so much if you are a cuban citizen who are not given access to real medical treatment or medicines.

Its funny how people can blind their eyes to the truth And say one mans murderer is another mans freedom fighter. I guess Heinrich Himmler was also a freedom fighter as both were in charge of state extermination camps. Is the difference that che illegaly entered foreign nations with the intent setting up terror groups and teaching them to murder innocents in the name a fanatical and failed idiology?
In my opinion freedom fighters should be respected and revered but men who commit murder and oversee extermination camps dont deserve that title.
One more thing I think George bush is a spoiled idiot but I also think removing saddam hussein was the right thing to do morally. It probably was a foolish thing to do in the sense that it did destablize the entire region. He was a brutal murderer who gassed entire villages men,women and children so he deserved to be put down. But in that region maybe a brutal murderer is the only type who can keep order.
At any rate as an anarchist you should be happy with all the anarchy bush has created in the middle east.

Anonymous said...

Very nice review Red Devil, I saw this distro at distrowatch and I decided not to downloaded but after reading this review I just changed my mind, I'll give it a try to check how it performs.

BTW, Just a question man, can you explain me how the Cristian Right in America benefits from the war in Irak?

red devil said...

@ Greg - In my last reply to your comments I made clear my political leanings. I have practically none these days, I'm too cynical and too knackered just trying to keep my head above water to worry about politics - and anyway, in the UK it's impossible to distinguish between the parties these days.
I am most definitely not an anarchist, though if you saw the mess in my house you would swear I was raising two young anarchists.
You make your points well but I feel you and I are destined never to agree - perhaps we start from very different standpoints.
Still, are we not both lucky to have the freedom to make our opinions known, even if they differ?
Thanks for taking the trouble to comment.

@ David - thank you for your very kind words, you flatter me too much. When I was thinking about writing this article I was conscious of the fact that it would probably stir up some strong reactions.
Nevertheless, I felt it was worth writing to show that the Linux community has a spirit of rebellion which ought to be nurtured and supported.
After all, this article is about Linux in general and BLAG 90000 in particular - and not about politics per se.

@ last anonymous comment re the Christian right. I recommend you read Blackwater, by Jeremy Scahill, a recent book about the rise of the Blackwater private American security firm, which operates in Iraq and which is owned by a leading member of the Christian right.
The book will give you a better insight than I am able to give you here.

Sam Duncan said...

'To say Guevara was motivated by pure hate is accurate, but you neglect to comment on the targets for his hate - tyrants and their lackeys, imperialists, monopolies, etc etc.'

The "etc." being anyone who looked at him a bit funny. I'm sorry, but anyone who describes himself as such isn't worth any "but..."s.

'You mention "murderers and criminals", but...'

No, I didn't. You did.

The attempt to draw equivalence with Blair and Bush - which I was expecting - is so absurd it barely deserves a reply. Suffice to say, with regard to the trite "poodle" epithet, that in the first interview I ever saw Blair give, in 1994, he mentioned Iraq as the country he was "most worried about". If anything, he led Bush, not vice-versa. And I don't recall either of them saying anything about pure hate. Maybe I missed it.

'this article is about Linux in general and BLAG 90000 in particular - and not about politics per se.'

Indeed. So why bring such a controversial figure into it?

I'm sorry that my first comment here has got us off on the wrong foot. I like your blog. You've done some useful and interesting reviews. But perpetuation of the Che cult is just laziness. The man was a cold-blooded murderer who hid behind ideology. Saying others were as bad, or worse, is beside the point; he is the one who's venerated as a hero on a million sickening T-shirts and student posters. Nobody would be happy with a comment like "Ubuntu reminds me of Pol Pot", or "Fedora always makes me think of Augusto Pinochet" so why does old Ernie get a free pass?

Red Devil said...

PLEASE NOTE: The post prior to this one has been deleted, not because I disagreed with the sentiments but because the anonymous commentator descended into personal abuse.
This is my blog and I will police it as I see fit - there are lots of comments here from people who disagree with me, and I am more than happy to leave them unedited.
If the abusive anonymous poster is unhappy with this, then he/she is perfectly free to set up his/her own blog, on which they can call me an SOB until the sun falls from the sky.
I will even post a link to it here.

@ Greg - Are you sure you want to liken Guevara's revolutionary tribunals - brutal though they undoubtedly were - to the Nazi extermination camps?
Is it really appropriate to liken a dictator's henchmen and thugs to the millions of innocent men, women and children slaughtered by Hitler?
Personally, I think not but you are entitled to your opinion.
As for removing the murdering tyrant Saddam Hussein, if Saddam was such a destabilising force in the Middle East, why did the Middle East not get rid of him?
Why do the USA and Britain still see themselves as the world's policemen?
And if you think the only reason America and Britain got involved in the affairs of Iraq was because they didn't like the bully who was running it, you are being naive.

@ Sam Duncan - Sam, I try to live my life in a way that causes no offence or harm, to be fair and, above all else, to be honest with myself and others.
Therefore, I am grateful to you for your comments, which have led me to read more about the life of Che Guevara.
With hindsight my Guevara analogy was a poor choice.
I referred to Guevara to express a general feeling of rebellion, rather than as a literal reference.
I should have found a better way to express that spirit of rebellion (and not anarchy!) which BLAG 90000 and Linux in general encapsulate.

Greg said...

Red devil

Why the second comment? You already answered my post in a way I thought was well said and that I agreed with ( that we would basically agree to disagree but it was a wonderful thing we both live in countries where we could state our opinions).

You say che only killed henchmen and thugs but thats not the way socialist revolutions work. Basically anyone who owns property or has any wealth is labeled an oppressor of the people and put to death. True some people gain wealth through unscrupulous means in any culture but many also gain it through hard work and even sometimes talent. I think Sir Winston Churchill said it best when he said "Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy". So labeling people as thugs and enemies of the state and then executing them just because they owned more than the average cuban does make him a murderer.

As far as Saddam Hussein goes.
I never said he was a destabilizing force in fact I said the opposite when I said that removing him had the effect of destabilizing the entire region. I simply stated that as a man who ordered several kurdish and shia villiages gassed without warning regardless of the fact he was killing innocent men women and children that he needed to be taken out (meaning killed) as he was by his own people. However I also stated that maybe someone like him was the only type who could keep order in that region.

As far as why Iraq waws invaded is very simple. Saddam was very nervous about Iran so he ran a disinformation campaign to convince the world that he had massive stockpiles of chemical biological and even nuclear weapons. And although that was primarily meant as a deterent to Iran it had the unfortunate effect of making the rest of the world very anxious. Every secrect sevice agency in the world both east and west thought he had them as well as his own generals who when the invasion was occuring kept asking him to deploy them.

As I said saddam was a cold blooded killer who granted did keep order in a place where order is not an easy thing to achieve. So you have to ask yourself if a murderer can keep order do you leave a murderer in charge of so many innocent lives or do you remove him and try to help the people set up a government that will at least honor their human rights.

It makes you wonder if 20 or 30 years from now leftists will be wearing Saddam Husein shirts claiming he was a great leader and champion of his people.

In closing Id like to say that those 2 replies were so different as to appear to have been written by 2 different people. I have read many of your other blogs and must say I enjoyed many of them and and hope to see many more (hopefully less political)

Saul said...

Millions of people in Cuba saw the revolution of 1959 as a liberation, and they see Che as a hero. The relatively small group of Cubans who fled their country after their wealth was expropriated have little moral standing to complain about murder, as they have engaged, as is publicly known and documented, in murder, terrorism, not to mention economic sabotage (also amply documented). The attempt to compare Che to a Nazi is nauseating, particularly when coming from right-wing Cuban exiles and "Cold Warriors" who supported the Nazi-like racists in Apartheid South Africa. No shame in associating Che with righteous rebellion, i.e, the same values millions across Latin America associate him with--Greg's is the opinion of an extreme minority of extreme anti-anticommunist propagandists.

And great choice for an alternative hero, Greg--Winston Churchill, who thought that his nation had right to rule others sheerly by force of conquest. This is called unrepentant naked imperialism, which was a moral outrage even so many decades ago when he was promoting it. It it buttressed by racism, an attitude which you apparently have no problem with, as evidenced by your contemptuous remarks about the people of the Middle East as a whole.

As far as the canard of "every intelligence agency in the world" believing that Sadaam had WMDs, if you read even the mainstream newspapers you would know that such nonsense can't even withstand what is now publicly known about how the CIA and the British government were browbeaten by the Bush government into greatly exaggerating any positive evidence and suppressing any evidence to the contrary--see the Downing Street Memo, the remarks of Iraq weapons expert Dr. David Kelly, the "curveball" fiasco, the "link" between Sadaam and al-Qaeda "proven" through testimony derived from torture, and the "dodgy dossier", in which it was revealed that the best "proof" the British intelligence service could provide was to plagiarize a student thesis written years before and then change the adjectives to make Saddam sound more threatening. Oh yes, then there's the fact that the only group of real experts actually on the ground looking for the weapons could not find any, and asked for more time to look which Bush contemptuously denied. All of this was known and almost all of it public before the war.

Even Alan Greenspan, who supported the war, has been honest enough to admit that it was about controlling oil. Please, think about it.

Your claims of concern about Saddam's crimes strain credulity, as "the coalition" charged to "make things right" has shot and bombed countless civilians (how many? care to guess?), and in fact tortured civilians to death, as shown by the army's own coroners' reports, and virtually destroyed the city of Fallujah, all with complete impunity. They insist on impunity, as they insist on the right to ignore all Iraqi law and public opinion. "Honor their human rights"? Uh, unless they conflict with the interests of the Americans as interpreted by Bush. How about this--ask any Iraqi who did more damage to Iraq: Saddam, or Bush? Care to take that exceedingly simple challenge?

I'll go back to using Blag.

Anonymous said...

Using gnu/linux to spread your marxist/communist views.. I seen it coming seeing as gnu/linux is a mixed bag of socialist/capitalist ideas.

rm -fr /Che Guevara

As for blag it is a powerful distro. Used it like it but it does not run so well on my older pc. No biggie. I will be waiting on gnewsense to implement the kernel libre! Let's hope stalin does not inspire you to write about it when it does so....

Greg said...

Saul

You said "Millions of people in Cuba saw the revolution of 1959 as a liberation". Possibly but for how long? Since you didnt like the Winston Churchill quote how about this one? From che Guevara's grandson?
Canek Sanchez Guevara: "The Cuban Revolution died some years ago: it had to be killed off by those who act in its name to make sure it didn't turn against them; it was institutionalized and smothered by its own bureaucracy, by corruption, nepotism and the rigidity of the much-celebrated Cuban 'revolutionary' state. All of my criticism of Fidel Castro comes from his walking away from the ideals of liberty, from his betrayal of his own people and his frightening zeal to place the interests of the state above those of his people. Let's be honest, a young rebel like Fidel Castro in today's Cuba wouldn't be sent into exile. He would be shot." Published in the Mexican newspaper Proceso in October of 2004.

That quote does mention an interesting fact that says much of the hypocrasy of leftists. After being captured during an armed insurgency the "tyrants and torturers of the former cuban regime sent castro into exile rather than execute him. Doesnt sound like they were near as bad as Che who said.
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary...These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the The Wall! (El Paredón)" --Ernesto 'Che' Guevara.
Sounds to me like the evil former regime had much more respect for human life than the current castro regime. But thats just how socialist dictatorships work.
As far as your statement to "ask any Iraqi who did more damage to Iraq: Saddam, or Bush?". I would imagine that would depend on whether you as a shia who were the opressed majority or a suny who were the privilaged minority.
Also as to your statement that bush is behind the Iraq intel if you were paying attention to anything in the media during the last 2 decades you would realize that intel existed long before bush came on the scene. Bush is just the main target of the leftist media and personally I think he is a fool but attributing to him intel that existed and was widely acknowledeged as fact by 2 previous administrations is disingenuous at best.
As to your experts on the ground not finding weapons and requesting more time. The reason they were not given more credence was that Saddam was not allowing them free access to inspect. That was unfortunate for him because he had to keep up appearances that he had them to keep Iran at bay and he really didnt think the us would actually invade until it was to late. You have to keep in mind that the reason that Germany,France and Russia didnt want the invasion to occur was purely economic. Since almost all the oil from Iraq Goes to those three nations they were afraid that their oil supply would be interupted if there was an invasion. But their intel agencies also believed he had the weapons.
Also I never claimed to be concerned about Saddams crimes against his people. I mearly stated my opinion that as a murderer he got what he deserved. Its funny that leftists always claim to care about human rights abuses but will totally overlook the most blatant offenses when carried out by those that share their ideology.
In closing I have to say totalitarian socialist states will always need "useful idiots" who have never had to live under the yolk of oppression to spread their ideology.

Red Devil said...

OK, that's enough now.
Everyone has had their say, some eloquent arguments and counter-arguments have been made.
I have already made it clear that, with hindsight, I made a mistake using Che Guevara as a point of reference for this article.
What I was trying to do was express the spirit of rebellion - not communism, not socialism and not anarchy - exhibited by BLAG 90000.
Obviously I failed, and this has been an important lesson.
Nonetheless, I will not allow this technology blog to become the focus of political flame wars, so any further comments on this subject will be deleted - call me a tyrant if you like.
And for future reference, I prefer my humble pie with custard, not ice cream.
;-)

Michael said...

I don't give a crap about the politics of it, and I'd rather read about what Blag has to offer.

It used to stand for 'sod the GPL Nazi's' IMO in that they gave you the ability to play DVD's, MP3's and get access to NTFS partitions by default and also gave you 'Flash' and Java so it was usable for web surfing immediately.

I used to like Blag, but the so called final release of 9000 is a buggy pile of crap with access to nothing by default - very disappointing as a whole, especially as the previous versions were very good.

Blag did for Fedora, what PClinuxOS did for Mandrake - made it usable by default and included 'Synaptic' for easier package management too, which is why the 9000 release is such a major let down for me

Glenn Condrey said...

C'mon people...some of you are taking this all too seriously.
I guess Linux can be politicized as has been shown here...but we are zeroing in on the wrong bad guys.
Steve Ballmer and Bill Gatus of Borg are our real enemies...not some deceased Marxist rebel who had his day in the sun.
We need to be turning our attention to the people who are trying to stifle innovation in the computing experience as a whole...people who were once viewed as pioneers...have now become the opressors.
I guess in your reference to Che Devil....you were absolutely correct.
Long live Linux! Viva la revolution!!

Michael said...

I see a 'bug fix' has been posted today on distrowatch (Blag 90001)

Not very impressed to see the comment "some of the bugs have been fixed" though. I could have lived with 'most', but not some !

Guess I'll wait till 90002 appears

Joseph said...

While amusing to read, this is not a good review by a long shot. Instead of raving about Che Guevera for about 3 paragraphs, why don't you try talking about the aspects of the actual distro??

Red Devil said...

@ Joseph - the article is not intended to be a review.
If it was, the title would have said "Review: Blag 90000 - The Rebel Distro".
It is a feature on the spirit behind the distro, not a detailed examination of how the distro works.
I made that plain in the article.
Not every article published about Linux is or has to be a review.
That said, I may return to BLAG at a later date for a detailed review.
You'll know I have when you see "Review: Blag XXXXX"'.
Thanks.

Anonymous said...

mike t as a vietman combat veteran and linux user i use blag and half of what i read on the blogging posts are a hint of what i think i fought for the right for people to have beliefs and i feel that`s what makes the world go round

Jeff Moe said...

Thanks for the nice article :)

I am not a communist. I would consider myself 100% anti-communist 100% anti-fascist. Che et. al. I think came with the right intentions, but power corrupts...The cuban rebellion and such did turn into a nightmare, but probably a nicer nightmare than if it had been left to the imperialists (cf Haiti, Dominican Republic).

For the record I'm a wikipedia anarchist. :)

-Jeff Moe, BLAG maintainer

Jeff Moe said...

Oh, ya, and re: 90000 sucking. It was probably the least polished blag release, hence followed up by 90001 in a week. There will be a 90002 too, likely reasonably soon. I will frequently update this series so you don't have to download tons of updates.

Fedora 9 shipped with Firefox 3 beta5. Wow, did that suck. Even 3.0 final was pretty bad. It's getting better, and I'll keep putting out new images as the base improves (e.g. we're at firefox 3.0.1 now). I put out a "stable" 90k series earlier than normal due to not doing a final 80k image (distracted by getting linux-libre going) and 70k was getting quite old.

Anyway, 90001 is quite usable, just stick to yum. :)

Oh, and as a quick note/correction, we do have a BLAGHEAD repository (Software from the Future), based on rawhide, but the BLAG 90k releases are based on Fedora 9.

But wait for FREEEEE, BLAG for EeePCs. Oh, that's gonna be the greatest hahahaha!

-Jeff Moe, BLAG

Red Devil said...

@ Jeff Moe - thanks for those clarifications